Skip to content

Kenya elections: good for justice?

March 13, 2013

To many disinterested observers last week’s Kenya elections seem like a victory not only for President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta, for his Jubilee Alliance, and for the Kikuyu and Kalenjin tribes represented by Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto. But also for impunity, because both Kenyatta and Ruto are indicted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity and – while they are presumed innocent until proven guilty – such overwhelming support for two people in their situation must surely be interpreted partly as vote against international justice.

Perversely though, this might be a good result for justice both in Kenya, and internationally as seen through the prism of the ICC,and for democracy in Kenya. Because with this result, things have become more complicated, with justice and politics intertwined in a complex tangle. It is when dealing with such complexity and disentangling the various elements that one gets to the nub of and internalises the real meaning of justice in the real, political world.

  • For the ICC and its international backers, dealing with the President and Vice-President of a sovereign country and signatory to the ICC’s Rome Statute will force it to become less lazy than in the past. Slogans will certainly not be enough to disentangle this knot.
  • Kenyatta and Ruto – assuming they have at least some desire to rule with legitimacy (and knowing that many of their supporters and opponents will make ruling difficult for them if they don’t) – will need to take the ICC indictments very seriously as part of their political discourse, as well as how they deal with it as indicted individuals.
  • Kenyan institutions – Parliament, judiciary, churches, civil society,  etc. – and their leaders will be forced to consider how to deal with the fact that their president is both democratically elected and a possible human rights violator. Complicated and, again, needs more than slogans.
  • The African Union and other regional and international bodies will also need to work out how they approach this delicate situation in which the head of another Member State is facing trial at the ICC.

All this is going to generate tremendous debate. Much will be biased, ill-informed and ill-judged. But however events unfold, the accompanying public and private debate has the potential to deepen some Kenyan future voters’ understanding of democracy and its choices and challenges; and to deepen the comprehension of us all as to how international mechanisms of justice interact with national political and justice mechanisms. Because we’ll largely have to fall back on first principles. I have written in an earlier blog post that the democratic pendulum swings long and slow – i.e. our innate understanding, as electors in a democracy, of how our democracy system works, is built over time by observing out of the corner of our eye, how the votes we collectively cast in the past lead to often long-delayed and often perverse outcomes and implications.  Voters in the UK had to come to terms with extreme implications of earlier voting decisions, under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s, which was painful, and we are no doubt learning something now, subliminally, from our current experiment with coalition politics. This may also be such a moment in Kenya, and provided Kenyans in the elite and at grass-roots avoid letting the complications they will now face, lead to violence, I see the outcome of this election as potentially laying another strong foundation layer for democracy there. Because democratic values emerge from difficult times, not easy ones.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. Mr and Mrs Loyatum permalink
    March 24, 2013 6:04 pm

    On your comment regarding the Kenyan election and Uhuruto victory.Well as much as the vote may have been an indictment of ICC,what may have escaped your attention is that it was Kenyan rebellion again the USA and UK overbearing behavior trying to coerce Kenya to vote in their choice.They said choices have consequences.They forgot that their statements also could generate an equal and opposite reaction.That is to strengthen their resolve against neocolonialism.In particular the British were simply being diplomatically stupid to want to support the indictment of Uhuru Kenyatta on flimsy charges knowing they had miscarried justice 50 years ago on his father Mzee Jomo Kenyatta.And they have not apologized for that just as much as the have not apologized for their misguided support for the incarceration of Nelson Mandela and their illegal and brutal violation of Iraq sovereignty on a lie regarding WMD that never existed.800,000 Iraqis lie in graves thanks to illegal adventures of George Walker Bush and Tonny Blair who should be at the Haque not Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto.

  2. June 4, 2013 6:06 am

    I was reading a vast amount into this information, and doing a lot of personal research. Basically, like all of us, I am aiming to develop a strong, lean, muscular body. The following blog is extremely useful for additional follow up information on the subject and I particularly found the section on maximuscle cyclone reviews very helpful indeed

  3. June 4, 2013 6:09 am

    Its consistently great to learn guidelines such as you part targeted blog posting. As I only began posting remarks targeted blog and dealing with trouble as in lots of rejections. I think the suggestion would be useful for me. i’ll let you know if its function for me too

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: